Twilight: A Review
Filed Under (Fascinating Womanhood, Women in Media) by Jasmine on 12-03-2010
Tagged Under : bella, edward, Fascinating Womanhood, romance novel, stephanie meyer, twilight, twilight review

Twilight: healthy or unhealthy? True romance, or pure deception? A good study into femininity, or nonsense?
I’d like to give my two cents on this pop-culture phenomenon sweeping the world of young women, simply because of its strength of influence.
In my opinion, the Twilight series is unhealthy, shallow, deceptive nonsense.
I recently read a feminist article criticizing Fascinating Womanhood (nothing surprising there) and how Bella from Twilight is a perfect example of all that F.W. teaches. Here is what it said:
“[Bella] has the pixie-dream-girl part down pat, what with her accident-prone fragility, her halting speech, her separateness from others, and her inability to participate in what most of the world knows as reality. And the extent to which the relationship between human Bella and vampire Edward depends on her childlike weakness—and his power to simultaneously threaten and protect her—is one of the more striking aspects of the series.”
Um, hello? This is not what F.W. teaches. Where did this author get that from? F.W. teaches women to be graceful (not “accident-prone”), a smooth conversationalist (not have “halting speech”), and to love, serve, and be generous to your family as well as those outside your family (not to have “separateness from others” or an “inability to participate in what most of the world knows as reality”).
I personally believe Bella is so far from being a fascinating woman, and that the romance between her and the unrealistic, “perfect” Edward so fake and shallow, that when I read Twilight, I COULDN’T BELIEVE HOW POPULAR IT WAS. I felt like I was reading manga-porn-turned-teenage-novel. The recurring thought I had was, “What has our society come to, that young women think this is beautiful, heart-melting romance?“ Disappointment in our young women is too weak a word to describe my feeling in regards to the popularity of this series.
* If you love the books/movies, please don’t be offended. This is just my view. I would, however, advise you on being very clear about the unrealistic-ness of the story, and not to let ideas about such flawless romance between two very immature, flawed people affect your own REAL relationships with REAL men. *
To me, the character Bella promotes neither feminists nor anti-feminists. Bella is a terrible role model for young women, as she has low self-esteem, is moody/depressed (except when Edward is around and giving her his full attention), socially awkward, emotionally needy, humorless, and a host of other unpleasant things. But guess what? SHE GETS THE HOT GUY! She gets the handsome, smart, strong, caring (immortal, lightning-fast, sparkly…) guy…and how? By smelling good. Wait, what was that? She smelled good, you mean, she wore nice perfume? Nope – her physical makeup, her chemistry, her blood, smelled irresistible to the vampire Edward.
You’ve got to be kidding. Girls fall for this? Girls fall for romance where a guy falls in love with the girl because she “smelled irresistible”?
I can’t comprehend it. It’s so shallow to me. Stephanie Meyer may as well be telling girls outright: “You can be plain-looking, physically and socially awkward, hate yourself and your life – but you can get the nice, hot guy all the girls want!”
Please, please ladies, don’t fall for this. Stories like this will only eventually depress you, as you, in all your many imperfections, will longingly wonder why your perfect “Edward” hasn’t come along and swept you off your feet yet.
It is CHALLENGING to follow F.W. because it is CHALLENGING to work to become a fascinating woman. That’s why girls want to believe in stories like Twilight, where the female character didn’t have to be a fascinating woman to have a passionate romance. But Twilight is fiction. In real life, the amazing, perfect guy won’t fall for a girl like Bella, because he deserves and wants better. So lay down (or if you haven’t read them, don’t read) these books and all books that have such shallow romance, and instead work to become a princess who can create her own REAL LIFE fairy tale. Fairy tales, and happily-ever-afters, can come true if you become the princess. This is the key.
To leave on a positive note, it’s possibly fair to say Bella at least has some redeeming qualities. She admires Edward as a strong, manly man, and awakens in him a feeling of protectiveness. Her character is more soft than hard. But who wouldn’t admire Edward (here I’m personally not talking about Robert Pattinson, sorry, not a fan), and how could a girl who almost breaks a bone with every step not awaken feelings of protectiveness in a guy? Oh but wait, he abandoned her in the middle of a forest to fend for herself overnight…hmmm…And “soft”, taken too far, can mean weakness of character (in this case it usually does). Maybe this wasn’t a very positive note…
Anyway, I hope I’ve made a fair point about Twilight. I would love to hear your opinion too, and welcome you to comment. If you loved it, why? If you hated it, why? What do you think of it in relation to F.W./femininity?









